For teams replacing an existing SaaS subscription
See whether keeping your SaaS, replacing part of it, or moving away from it makes business sense before the current tool becomes the expensive fallback.
The work behind the visible workflow
People can access only the records and actions they need
Integrations handle expired credentials, limits, and bad input
A bad release can be reversed before it disrupts operations
Another engineer can run and support the replacement
The savings remain after setup, hosting, support, and owner time
Three clear outcomes
Interest
We compare the current vendor, the replacement app, and the work your business needs it to perform.
We fix the blocking risks, test the fallback, and support one planned switch.
Planned monitoring, backup checks, updates, releases, documentation, and periodic cost reviews after the switch.
The economic test
The replacement has to beat renewal after the costs of building, operating, supporting, and changing it are included.
Desire
Keep the existing app wherever it meets the written checks.
The old SaaS remains available until the agreed tasks and rollback tests pass.
Your organization keeps the code, data, accounts, credentials, and documents.
If renewal is smarter, the report says so.
Introduction
I’m the founder of Boldkite. I help businesses turn ideas and AI-built apps into reliable software people can use.
I bring 15+ years of hands-on software engineering experience across customer-facing products, AI systems, production releases, reliability, incident response, and engineering leadership.
When you work with Boldkite, you work directly with me—no account managers or handoffs between you and the engineering work.
Stack
Your code, accounts, credentials, and customer data remain yours. Access is limited to the agreed work and is never used for training or shared outside the engagement.
Frequently asked
Keep it when the support, safeguards, features, and roadmap justify the cost. The assessment is designed to recommend renewal when replacing it does not make business sense.
No. It compares renewal, partial replacement, and full replacement using the costs and workflows that matter. If owning the replacement removes the savings, the report says so.
A process owner and representative users should approve the important tasks before cancellation. If adoption is uncertain, the recommendation will be to run a pilot or delay the switch.
The plan defines when to stop, who communicates, and how to return to the old system or a manual process. The highest-risk steps are tested before the old vendor is cancelled.
Action
Work with us to make the right call and plan a safe replacement.
Get a $1,500 Replacement DecisionThe first paid step
$1,500 fixed price
A practical decision about whether your internal replacement is safer and less expensive than renewing the current software.
Prefer to talk it through first? Book a 15-minute fit call